I first published Political Pies, my collection of short stories with a political
theme, in the early fall of 2012.
Besides hoping that people would buy it and I’d make some money off of
it, is the hope that my stories would spark an idea and readers would reexamine
some of their political beliefs.
Therefore, it made sense to get copies to as many people as possible. Which is why since then I try to have it free
to download on elections and the Fourth of July. I think sometimes I forget, but I try to have
my free promotions linked to some political/national event. Which is a long winded way to say that to
mark the Inauguration tomorrow, you can now download the Kindle version of Political Pies through Sunday. So if you haven’t already, grab your free
copy now.
Thursday, January 19, 2017
Wednesday, December 14, 2016
An energy question
Let’s suppose there are only two energy
sources. We’ll call them Energy Source A
and Energy Source B. Pound for pound –
if that makes any sense since these two are very different – you can get ten
times as much energy from A than B. A
lot of people would then say, “We should use Energy Source A then,” without
looking any further into the matter.
But those who do look further note a few
things. A vital component of Energy
Source A – the fuel, a special metal needed for the power plant, something – is
located at random areas around the globe.
This means that if your country didn’t win the geography lottery and has
this vital component, you have to import it.
Meaning that foreign elements could disrupt your supply of it. Also, some countries may go to war to secure
a supply of it, only to disrupt the global trading of it. On the other hand, you could set up an Energy
Source B power plant pretty much anywhere.
Does the added cost of securing the supply of the vital component of
Energy Source A diminish its superiority?
Also, the normal size of an Energy Source
A power plant supplies enough power for an entire city. You could build a massive Energy Source B
power plant to supply power to a city, but you could also build smaller plants
that supplies power to a suburb, or a handful of neighborhoods in the
city. Some people would say that Energy
Source A is clearly better because you can supply more people with more power
from one plant. But what if something
goes wrong, such as a mechanical failure or even a terrorist attack? If it happens to the A power plant, you knock
out power to an entire city. But if it
happened at a B power plant, you just knock out power to a few
neighborhoods.
Given these scenarios, is Energy Source A
still better than B?
Tuesday, November 29, 2016
The problem with banning flag burning
I first wrote this story back in
2006. I revised it for my collection of
politically themed short stories Political Pies in 2012. And now, thanks to Trump, it’s relevant
again.
“Star-Spangled Ploy”
Slamming his fist on his podium, Senator
Conant exclaimed, “And that is why I voted for a Constitutional Amendment to
ban flag burning.”
This was met with uneven applause from the
packed auditorium.
“Thank you, Senator Conant.” The Moderator
then turned her head slightly towards the Senator’s opponent. “Mister Drake, same question.”
Drake smiled. “I agree with the Senator that it is a shame,”
his hand slapped his podium, “that we can’t send our kids outside without a
burning flag being crammed down their throats.
I believe ….” He pointed at the audience, then brought his finger to his
lips and tapped it a few times. “I
believe I’ve never actually seen a flag being burnt, other than on TV when
foreigners – outside US jurisdiction – were protesting America. Have you, Senator?” Without waiting for an
answer, he looked to the audience. “Has
anyone here?” After a slight pause he asked, “Yet how many of you are
struggling with obscenely high energy bills?” Drake raised his hand, which was
joined by scores more.
Drake took a deep breath. “For those of you pained by the thought of a
flag being burned, I understand and respect your sentiment. But amending the Constitution to ban flag
burning is not the solution. If
anything, it will make matters worse.”
Holding his hand out, as if to silence any
remarks, Drake said, “Let me explain. A
few flags are burned each year in this country in protest. I repeat, a few. Very few.
I don’t have the exact number, but I would bet it is less than a
hundred. Now, if this amendment passed,
a date will have to be set for when the law takes effect, say January 1st. Do you know what would happen on December 31st? Thousands, tens of thousands of Americans
would gather in Washington, D.C. and in cities large and small across the
nation. And just before the stroke of
midnight, they would light thousands upon thousands of flags on fire. Your options are to either know that a
hundred flags are burned each year, or watch as thousands are burned before
your eyes. And it would not end once
January 1st came. People will take
pieces of cardboard, draw a flag on it, and burn that. Unless the ban is Draconian in its
description of what constitutes an American flag, such an act would be
perfectly legal. And I suspect that
people will line up before the White House, and the Supreme Court, and in
thousands of other places and burn these cardboard flags day after day after
day until the Amendment is repealed.” Drake shrugged. “The simple truth, a Constitutional Amendment
banning flag burning will only result in hundreds of thousands of flags and
flag-like objects being burned.
Period. That’s the only thing
that will happen.”
Drake jabbed his podium with his
finger. “Now, of all the problems facing
America today, flag burning is number 3,714.
Call me crazy, but I think the first 3,713 problems are far more
important. Problems such as: Social
Security, health care, national security, education, immigration, gas prices,
crime, incompetent leadership, the deficit, the environment, unemployment,
racial tensions, rogue nations, poverty, decaying infrastructure, bigotry,
foreign and domestic terrorism, drug abuse, invasions of privacy … I could go
on and on.
“You may ask, given all these problems,
why is flag burning such a big issue?
Well, I have a theory. I believe
flag burning is a ploy being used by certain elected officials to mask the fact
that they,” Drake looked directly at Conant, “have accomplished nothing.” Drake
pointed at a random audience member, “Nothing for you.” Pointing at more people
he continued, “Or you, or you, or your child who can’t afford to go to college,
or your grandfather who has to go to Canada to get his medication, or your wife
whose job was outsourced, or all of us when we pay an arm and a leg at the gas
pump.”
Pounding his fist on his podium, Drake
raised his voice, “We have wasted enough time on this diversion. Let’s get back to the real problems of
America: yours!”
The auditorium shook from the applause.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
