I
haven’t really said anything about the Brexit vote because I’m an American who
hadn’t really heard of it until a couple of weeks before it happened and I only
know about certain issues that the people I follow have talked about. But my overall feeling right now is that if
there is a second vote – which it seems enough people are calling for so it
probably should happen – the results will most likely be flipped. Settling the matter once and for all.
Just
kidding.
One
of the Brexit issues I heard about is something I’ve also heard here in America
about people not wanting other people hundreds of miles away from them making
laws that the first group of people don’t agree with but still have to live
with. Some of these people talk almost
as if there are only two options: one with no laws or regulations and one with
a tyrannical government imposing overreaching laws and regulations. It seems they deny the possibility of good governance
with commonsense laws and regulations.
Question,
should it be legal for me to take a spoon and dig out someone’s eye if I didn’t
like the way they were looking at me?
The vast majority of people would say no. (If you said yes, you need to seek
professional, mental help.) Would that
count as a good, commonsense law then?
If so, why should it only apply to a certain geographic set of
people? Especially if they are only a
certain geographic set of people because centuries ago other people just drew
some lines on a map? Should we work only
on smaller, more local governance, or better overall governance?
You
might be interested in this other post I did on another site: Do not knowingly harm others.
No comments:
Post a Comment